Volume 14, Issue 2 (April 2026)                   J. Pediatr. Rev 2026, 14(2): 145-154 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Emadi Majd F, Langari S F, Langari S H. Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Lateral Cephalometric Detection and Analysis: A Narrative Review. J. Pediatr. Rev 2026; 14 (2) :145-154
URL: http://jpr.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-819-en.html
1- Department of Orthodontics, TD.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
3- Department of Radiology, Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , seyyedhasanlangari@gmail.com
Abstract:   (3 Views)
Background: Malocclusion is a common condition in children, often requiring timely orthodontic intervention during critical stages of craniofacial development. Lateral cephalometric radiography remains a fundamental diagnostic modality; however, manual landmark identification suffers from subjectivity, time consumption, and inter-examiner variability—challenges that are amplified in growing pediatric patients. 
Objectives: To review recent applications of artificial intelligence in pediatric lateral cephalometric analysis, focusing on automated landmark detection, diagnostic accuracy, clinical usefulness, educational value, and radiation-reducing innovations.
Methods: This narrative review synthesizes peer-reviewed literature published between January 2020 and October 2025. Studies evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) systems for cephalometric analysis in pediatric or adolescent populations were included, with emphasis on methodological approaches, accuracy metrics, clinical feasibility, and innovations such as low-dose imaging or photograph-based landmark prediction. 
Results: Deep learning models—particularly convolutional and region-based neural networks—consistently achieved landmark localization errors below 2 mm, meeting clinically acceptable thresholds. AI integration significantly reduced analysis time (from 10–30 minutes to seconds) and enhanced reproducibility, especially when used in hybrid workflows combining algorithmic output with clinician verification. Educational applications showed improved trainee performance, while emerging non-ionizing approaches (e.g. AI-driven prediction from facial photographs) offered promising radiation-reduction strategies. Nevertheless, limitations persist, including platform-specific performance disparities, insufficient diversity in training datasets, and limited model interpretability. 
Conclusions: AI is not a replacement for clinical expertise but a powerful adjunct in pediatric cephalometric analysis. It enhances diagnostic efficiency, supports education, and enables safer imaging alternatives. Future implementation must prioritize diverse pediatric data, transparent and explainable architectures, and real-world validation to ensure equitable, reliable, and ethically sound clinical adoption. 
Full-Text [PDF 1989 kb]   (5 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Narrative Review | Subject: Dentistry
Received: 2025/11/1 | Accepted: 2025/11/10 | Published: 2026/04/12

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Pediatrics Review

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb